Ernst Nolte European Civil War -

For Nolte, the chain of causation was brutally linear. Lenin and Trotsky had declared a global civil war against the bourgeoisie. They had executed the Tsar and his family, instituted the Red Terror, and, in the early 1930s, engineered the Holodomor—the deliberate starvation of millions of Ukrainian peasants. This, Nolte argued, was a “class-based genocide.” The Nazis, watching from Germany, were paralyzed with fear. They saw in Bolshevism an existential, Asiatic threat that would drown Europe in blood. Their response—the racial war against Slavs, the Final Solution—was, in his view, a panicked, over-the-top “defensive” reaction.

The European Civil War is a useful metaphor for the 20th century’s ideological fratricide. But a metaphor is not an alibi. The Gulag and Auschwitz are not twins; they are cousins, separated by a chasm of intent. One was a monstrous system of political terror; the other was a machinery designed to erase an entire people from the earth. ernst nolte european civil war

Nolte’s central claim was radical: The 20th century was not a simple battle of good versus evil, nor a series of national tragedies. Instead, it was a single, cataclysmic —a conflict that began in 1917 with the Bolshevik Revolution and did not truly end until the fall of the Berlin Wall in 1989. Within this framework, Nazism was not an inexplicable eruption of German barbarism. It was, in Nolte’s controversial phrase, a “copy” or a “distorted mirror image” of the Soviet Gulag. The Holocaust, he suggested, was a “Asiatic” deed born of a panic-stricken reaction to Bolshevik “class murder.” For Nolte, the chain of causation was brutally linear