Unlike classical studies (for the elite) or sciences (for utility), English could be taught across social ranks. It aimed to produce a common culture, to instill empathy, moral sensibility, and national identity. It was ideal for the emerging professional-managerial class and for training colonial administrators.

I’m unable to provide the full text of Terry Eagleton’s The Rise of English (a chapter from his 1983 book Literary Theory: An Introduction ) due to copyright restrictions. However, I can offer a detailed summary of its key arguments, which are widely discussed in literary studies. In this foundational chapter, Eagleton argues that English literature as an academic discipline did not emerge purely for aesthetic or scholarly reasons, but as a ideological response to specific social and political crises in 19th-century Britain.

With the rise of industrial capitalism and scientific rationalism, traditional religious faith weakened among the middle and upper classes. “English” stepped in as a substitute for religion—offering moral guidance, spiritual consolation, and social cohesion.

相关资源
限时折上折活动
限时折上折活动